Literature
Publications by PI
Hopster JKG, Löhr G. (2023). Conceptual Engineering and Philosophy of Technology: Amelioration or Adaptation? Philosophy & Technology 36(70): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00670-3
Veluwenkamp H, Hopster JKG, Köhler S, Löhr G. eds. (forthcoming). Socially Disruptive Technologies and Conceptual Engineering. Special issue: Ethics and Information Technology. https://link.springer.com/collections/dbbebbcjia
Hopster JKG, Gerola A, Hofbauer B, Löhr G, Rijssenbeek J, Korenhof P. (forthcoming). Who owns ‘nature’? Conceptual Appropration in discourses on Climate- and Biotechnologies. Environmental Values. https://www.whpress.co.uk/publications/evf/#EVart
Van de Poel I, Hermann J, Hopster, JKG, Lenzi D., Nyholm S., Taebi B., Ziliotti E. eds. (2023). Ethics of Socially Disruptive Technologies: An Introduction. Open Book Publishers: https://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0366
Hopster JKG, Maas M. (2023). The Technology Triad: Disruptive AI, Regulatory Gaps and Value Change. AI and Ethics. doi.org/10.1007/s43681-023-00305-5
Hopster, JKG. (2023). Climate Change, Uncertainty and Policy. In: Pellegrino G, Di Paolo M eds. Handbook of the Philosophy of Climate Change. Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16960-2_16-1
Hopster JKG, Arora C., Blunden C, Eriksen C, Frank L, Hermann J, Klenk M, O’Neill E, Steinert S. (2022). Pistols, Pills, Pork and Ploughs: The Structure of Technomoral Revolutions. Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy: 1–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2022.2090434.
Danaher J, Hopster JKG. (2022). The Normative Significance of Moral Revolutions. Futures 103046: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2022.103046
Hopster JKG. (2022). Future Value Change: Identifying Realistic Possibilities and Risks. Prometheus: Critical Studies in Innovation 38(1). Special issue: Designing for Value Change: 113–123. https://doi.org/10.13169/prometheus.38.1.0113
Klenk M, O’Neill E, Arora C, Blunden C, Hopster JKG, Eriksen C., Frank L. (2022). Recent Work on Moral Revolutions. Analysis 82: 354–366. https://doi:10.1093/analys/anac017
Hopster JKG. (2021). Climate Uncertainty, Real Possibilities, and the Precautionary Principle. Erkenntnis 88: 2431–2447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-021-00461-2
Hopster JKG. (2021). The Ethics of Disruptive Technologies: Towards a General Framework. In: JF de Paz Santana and DH de la Iglesia eds. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Cham: Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-87687-6_14
Hopster JKG. (2021). What are Socially Disruptive Technologies? Technology in Society 67, 101750: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101750
Hopster JKG. (2020). Shall we Adapt? Evolutionary Ethics and Climate Change. In: Hermann J, Hopster JKG, Kalf W, Klenk M eds. Philosophy in the Age of Science? Inquiries into Philosophical Progress, Method, and Societal Relevance. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
Hopster JKG. (2020). Explaining Historical Moral Convergence: The Empirical Case against Realist Intuitionism. Philosophical Studies 177: 1255–1273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-019-01251-x
Outreach
‘A new climate law in the Balearic Islands will protect the wellbeing of present and future generations – if such thing can be defined.’ Byskov MF, JKG Hopster, JI Isern Bennassar (2023). Opinion in The Conversation (16 August). https://theconversation.com/a-new-climate-law-in-the-balearic-islands-will-protect-the-wellbeing-of-present-and-future-generations-if-such-thing-can-be-defined-209946
‘Van Vegaburger to VR-bril: Hoe nieuwe technieken ons leven op zijn kop zetten.’ (2023). Interview by L. Dros in Trouw (17 April). https://www.trouw.nl/religie-filosofie/van-vegaburger-tot-vr-bril-hoe-nieuwe-technieken-ons-leven-op-zijn-kop-zetten~bae82c54/
Hopster JKG ed (2023). Disruptieve Technologie. Special issue Wijsgerig Perspectief 63(1). https://www.aup-online.com/content/journals/10.5117/WP2023.1.001.HOPS
‘Pistols, Pills, Pork and Ploughs: How Technology Changes Morality’. Interview by J. Danaher for Philosophical Disquisitions: https://philosophicaldisquisitions.blogspot.com/2022/11/101-pistols-pills-pork-and-ploughs-how.html
Hopster JKG (2021). Klimaatwinnaars. De Groene Amsterdammer (het Groene Lab), 29 October. https://www.groene.nl/artikel/klimaatwinnaars
Hopster JKG. (2020). The IPCC’s Uncertainty Terminology: Update Needed? Climate Footnotes. https://climatefootnotes.com/2020/08/13/the-ipccs-uncertainty-terminology-update-needed-by-jeroen-hopster/
Relevant literature
Abram S, Atkins E, Dietzel A, Jenkins K, Kiamba L, Kirshner J, Kreienkamp J, Parkhill K, Pegram T, Santos Ayllón LM. (2022). Just Transition: A Whole-systems Approach to Decarbonisation. Climate Policy 22(8): 1033–1049.
Brey P. (2012). Anticipatory Ethics for Emerging Technologies. Nanoethics 6: 1–13.
Burgess A, Cappelen H, Plunkett D eds. (2020). Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Brown A. (2017). A Theory of Legitimate Expectations. Journal of Political Philosophy 25 (4): 435–460.
Caney S. (2016). Climate Change, Equity, and Stranded Assets. Oxfam America Research Backgrounder Series: 1–56.
Danaher J. (2021). Axiological Futurism: The Systematic Study of the Future of Human Values. Futures 132, 102780: 1–14.
Green F. (2017). Legitimate Expectations, Legal Transitions, and Wide Reflective Equilibrium. Moral Philosophy and Politics 4(2): 177–205.
Green F, Gambhir A. (2020). Transitional Assistance Policies for Just, Equitable and Smooth Low-carbon Transitions: Who, How and What? Climate Policy 20: 902–921.
Klenk M, O’Neill E, Arora C, Blunden C, Hopster JKG, Eriksen C, Frank L. (2022). Recent Work on Moral Revolutions. Analysis 82(2): 354–366.
Meyer L, Sanklecha P. (2014). How Legitimate Expectations Matter in Climate Justice. Politics, Philosophy & Economics 13(4): 369–393.
Meyer L, Truccone-Borgogno S. (2022). Legitimate Expectations: Assessing Policies of Transformation to a Low-Carbon Society. Environmental Values 6, 701-720.
Meyer L, Waligore T. (2022). Superseding Historical Injustice? New Critical Assessments. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 25(3): 319-330.
Mintz-Woo K, Leroux, J. (2021). What do Climate Change Winners Owe, and to Whom? Economics and Philosophy 37(3): 462-483.
Moore M. (2017). Legitimate Expectations and Land. Moral Philosophy and Politics 4(2): 229–255.
Nickel P, Kudina O, van de Poel I. (2022). Moral Uncertainty in Technomoral Change: Bridging the Explanatory Gap. Perspectives on Science 30(2): 260–283.
Otto I. et al. (2020). Social Tipping Dynamics for Stabilizing Earth’s climate by 2050. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117: 2354–2365.
Taebi B, Kwakkel JH, Kermisch C. (2020). Governing Climate Risks in the face of Normative Uncertainties. WIREs Climate Change 11(5): e666: 1–11.
Taiwo, O. (2022). Reconsidering Reparations. Oxford University Press.
Waldron J. (1992). Superseding Historic Injustice. Ethics 103(1): 4–28.